The diagram that he invented worked as thus: By symbology[1], a state
machine is described as a state, thus being both the agent and the agency
of its own manufacture[2]. So that equation of the
propagation (of information)[3], by the reciprocity principle[4], that
the mechanics of the state machine may be freely (for some difficult
albeit rigorous definition) represented by two "universes" (suitably
defined but again probably mathematically beyond strict analysis by
[and this word is important] creatures of 3.N(+)D of an
atomic/chemical[5] nature whose contemporary and ephemeral
biological "advantage"
(ibid) resulting in the (always) catclysmic disadvantage, that,
subject to a/effect to advance historically rich nature is such to
Believe.) to those that would descriminate, either definitionally
and/or to establish in set theory notationally the (ibid,
self-referrential and recursively herein terminated as such, with
context and not to be discounted as the constitutive (referencing,
e.g. symbolically, ibid/e.g. infinity divided by zero) end of the
(symbolically, though not logically, constrained loop)) canon
(obviously self defined).

----

[1] semiotics, so pointlessly christened such to be a symbol (of the
science and art of symbols) without (explicitly referenced) historic roots,
excepting the obvious, as via, in non-rigorous form, Brown Emeriti
and (more rigorously though never published) Jerome Petri

[2] All state machines, being contrivances (of "convenience"), work as
such (this text, of course, being itself such a mechanism), leading
the philosophic to question whether information (as a medium, being
the only "container" "noun" as dictated by the evolution
of natural language given propensity to by the (e.g.) speech center of
the (suitably, and acutely anthropomorphilogically, genetically
accorded) brain[a] in order to facilitate a fascimile[b] of the (often
presumed) infinite (functionality of the) universe[c], the simulator
thereby to, (vis-a-vis) trial and (taking the classical cliche) error,
impart biological advantage[d]) is (again, contraversially, and
again as a typical linguistic/mnemonic exemplar) as classically held
in Occidental and post/meta scientific jargon, a
studyable/conceivable/real noumenon, in the light that all information
theory is[e] the fashion of a state machine in fashioning a(nother)
state machine, the ramification beheld "bio"-historically
as the rise of the "universe" by which (i.e. non-proven
and non-provable hyperstate) Existence [capitalization unnecessary].
--
[a]'advantage' being a term as fixed by the survivors (and passers on
in the general sense) (and therefore) at least in the (D)NA
(etc, the ideographic covariant)
paradigm, the progenitors, given rise to the inquiry,
congenially (explicitly) ignored herein, of the (ibid) "philosophic"
lacking a better term of the "will" to perpetuate in contrast to the concept.
--
[b] simulacrum
--
[c] the 'u'/'U' capitalized (as according) to belief
--
[d] again, projected herein as intentless as conceivable given the
constraints of English narrative form, itself an exhibit and prime
example of the topic state machine wrt/apropos symbology (as a front
for and in contrast to information mechanics)
--
[e] as Jerome Petri, in spite of (or even (especially) via)
whatever extrapolations he so (for expedience) took,
proved (in reduced dimensionality), though few (perhaps
one, perhaps none) understood the absolute definition and
mechanics (i.e. low-level information Mechanics [capitalization as so
he would effect], as such related beyond, so it is said, human
understanding, being perceptually limited to (provincially)
3.N(+) fractal space; but that said, as all things are a manifestation
(or rather, if one may take the appropriate e.g. "linguistic"
(i.e. "conceptual") limit, the reverse)
of infinity divided by zero (as a chosen symbologically and
effectively) ("nameless" "infinite") space (space, again
(ibid), and the similes/methaphors/linguistic extrapolations herein
implied, and also explicit, a standing in for of so-said
'homo sapien' (and in the appropriate venacular, 'sapien')[6] of a
suitably boxed in explanation of "such" (also "stuff", in the
technical sense) that allows conceptual, and threby inherently
misrepresentative) towards (the concept of) pan-dimensional entropy
(Ref: http://k0s.org/blog/20120509093656) that any system may describe
itself within its systemic parameters without completeness, and yet
still with the survival, in the short term, advantages of the
manifestation of conciousness)
of his exhibition.

[3] communication, as rigorously defined

[4] As presented in (e.g.) classical electrodynamics, i.e. antennae
theory, but the (information) "mechanism" is, in fact, non-specific to
Maxwell's equations and may be derived independently from first
principles (e.g. including, but not limited to (quote, and archaic)
quantum mechanics)

[5] and, yes, electrical if one is considers the vector of dividing
forces for (naively, though classically evidently) computational assemblege

[6] though also see corvids, cephalopods, cetaceans, etc.  Humanity
equates intelligence by which it can easily[a] recognize as
intelligence.  [There is little pondering as to that, for to question
the standards of a Society (e.g.) that recognizes as a
constitutive informational vector (length) the happenstance of (the
actionable advantages of) breeding, the facility of (e.g.) a
particular language (and/or the numerical value of language
fluencies), counting (which is, in fact, the basis of all [3.N(+)D
conceivable] mathematics), the ability (shim) to regurgitate esoterica
(the more complicated, vs inherently complex, the better), art
(definitionally ill-defined), which makes up that which is called
civilization, the only bridge between the monkey-mind and the Absolute.]
--
[a] itself an actionable flaw (ibid) of (i.e.) evolution